PFB asked CEC some basic questions via FOI. We hoped the answers to these questions may help us understand why a more suitable method of safe alternatives to remove the weeds is never chosen … Unfortunately many questions always remained unanswered The case was passed onto the Information Commissioner to investigate It has now been confirmed (by the non biased third party) Information Commissioner that CEC failed to provide us with adequate information CEC have been given dea

May 2026 Our vote, it can seem , may not have as much validity as we once knew, but thankfully our persistent actions still could. TAKE ACTION Sign the Petition Email the Council Make your street Pesticide Free Every single day we can influence the future with each action we take or don’t take! Councils like to be seen to provide what is popular. What has the vote. Many issues we can influence by our personal actions and are publicly driven You have the right to demand that K

May 2026 Every important issue of the day , depends on the core health of its citizens Schools Hospitals Economy Environment If we actively choose to poison our own habitat by using GLYPHOSATE it goes without saying we weaken the health of citizens , increase pressure on hospitals , have poor academic results in schools and a weakened economy. If you genuinely wanted to help any and all of these issues You would immediately end the use of KNOWN HARMFUL TO HEALTH CHEMICALS be

May 2026 It seems almost too obvious, to most of us , that safe alternatives are preferable to toxic harmful chemicals for weed control You probably think your decision makers agree. BUT You may be surprised . … Ask do they choose continued use of….?????? GLYPHOSATE-KNOWN TOXIC HARFUL TO HEALTH CHEMICALS GLYPHOSATE is presently chosen by decision makers to be used in most communities, (except Balerno) . It is known to be harmful to health of humans and animals. Linked to Canc